• Photo by Annie Spratt on Unsplash

    “So, young man, what do you do?”

    It is a question that begets more questions. For one, there are only two of us in the library, and neither of us are young. For another, there is a sign on the wall, printed in A4 size paper which reads “Silence Please”. Clearly, the power of the sign has waned. 

    He continues to look at me, bushy white eyebrows shivering with concentration. Ever so slowly, realisation begins to dawn. I might not know the man himself, but I certainly recognise the type – the Determined Uncle.

    A Determined Uncle can be very, very difficult to stop. Impossible one might say, and if this was said to me, I would nod vigorously in agreement. Determined Uncles, amongst other peculiarities, tend to approach any conversation with a soapbox mentality, viewing it less as a two-way dialogue and more as a chance to launch into monologues. Replete with broad generalisations, and facts garnered from mysterious sources.

    They often begin these “conversations” with innocuous questions, like the one thrown at me.

    The DU is still looking at me, expecting an answer, a side door through which he can poke his shoe and walking stick in.

    I reply, like the naïve and honest fool that I am, “I help those who want to study law abroad.”

    Side door spotted. Insert shoe and walking stick.

    Twenty minutes later, I am made aware of the fact that the DU does not approve of education counsellors. Or rather, the DU does not approve of Indians who want to study abroad, and/or immigrate out of the country. Picking through the monologue, a tedious affair, I identifed five lines of arguments the DU makes.

    This is India’s decade, if you want to grow professionally, do it here. What is there abroad?

    True, the potential of professional growth is immense in India, especially compared to other countries. Growth will come, provided you have the right qualifications, social and otherwise. And this “growth” will be uneven, it will be concentrated. You can already see it happening all around you, can’t you? A billionaire every five days in the same country where 800 million people rely on State sponsored food distribution schemes.

    There is family here, there is social support. There you will be all alone.

    I can’t disagree with this one. There is certainly something to be said about Indian social networks, and the sense of community that comes along. The only exception would be if these networks provoke a sense of claustrophobia, making you crave the anonymity that living abroad offers in a way that India never can.

    There is this whole belief that anything foreign is somehow better. That is just not true, our universities are equally good!

    Again, hard to disagree with. There is certainly an element of fascination with the foreign, especially when it comes to the “developed” world. At the same time, it makes little sense to view education providers through a binary lens – there are pros and cons with both sets, and this is unlikely to change. Perhaps what would be far more prudent is to see how these pros and cons fit into your own personal needs and ambitions.

    Stay in India, contribute to your nation’s growth

    This is where things get tricky. For the immigrant’s dilemma is a perplexing one, a dilemma that exists in a permanent state of flux. At what stage can you “disown” your country and your roots, if at all.  Can you integrate into the new, without losing the old? All in a country which is seeing a growing sense of discontent with the State and a strangely concomitant rise in hyper nationalism.

    India’s cities are the best in the world, what do foreign cities provide?

    This is where I begin to lose interest, and a bit of my sanity as well. Indian cities are on the verge of collapse, with no solution in sight. Bombay, the city where this conversation takes place, is a perfect example of this, but there are so many others.

    With air that is poisonous, a greed that never sleeps, and lies sold under the cover of “development”, the future can look quite grim.

     

    At the end of the day, I suppose it all depends on perspective; there can be no wrong or right answer. Unless of course you are a Determined Uncle – then there can only be one right answer. Just one.

  • Photo by Towfiqu barbhuiya on Unsplash

    With multiple LLM applications, each often requiring their own set of documentation, come multiple deadlines. And for those who work best when pushed to the wall, a clear set of deadlines can often be just what the doctor (education consultant?) ordered.

    The fact of the matter is that foreign LLM’s can be terribly expensive, and with financial aid in short supply, it makes sense to get a good idea of the different costs of an LLM at the very start of the application process.

    Which is why, here is a list of LLM tuition fees and application deadlines for some the most popular law schools (based on our data of Indian law graduates) in the world.

    Do note that the numbers and dates mentioned in the tables below are based on the data available on the respective law schools’ websites as of 3 October, 2024 and might be subject to change and/or out of date.

    Lastly, please also note that tuition is just one component of the total cost of living; other costs include housing, books, health insurance etc.

    (All figures are hyperlinked to the source page)

    US Law Schools (2024)

    School/UniversityApplication DeadlineTuition
    Columbia Law SchoolDec 1, 2024$81,888
    Cornell Law SchoolDec 15, 2024$81,306
    Duke University School of LawFeb 1, 2024$77,100
    Fordham University School of LawMultiple admission cycle$75,728
    Georgetown University Law CentreJul 1, 2025$82,264
    Harvard Law School Dec 1, 2024$77,100
    Northwestern Pritzker School of LawJan 15, 2025$80,252
    NYU School of LawDec 18, 2024$79,954
    Penn State LawMar 1, 2025$56,928
    Stanford Law SchoolDec 2 2024$74,475
    The Fletcher School at Tufts UniversityMultiple windows$57,364
    The George Washington University Law SchoolMultiple windows$61,152
    UC Berkeley School of LawDec 18, 2024$75,550
    University of Chicago Law SchoolDec 15, 2024(Submission)$76,479
    University of Miami School of LawMultiple Deadlines $70,690
    University of Michigan School of LawJan 15, 2025$76,974
    University of New Hampshire Franklin Pierce School of LawMay 1, 2025 (Priority)$41,000
    Yale Law School Dec 1, 2024$74,044

    UK Law Schools for Overseas Applicants(2024)

    University & CourseApplication DeadlineTuition
    Edinburgh Law School’s LL.M.Multiple windows£24,700
    Essex University’s LL.M. International Human Rights LawMultiple Windows£21,700
    Kings College London LL.M.To be announced£33,450
    LSE LL.M.Rolling£36,168
    QMUL LL.M.Sep 1, 2025£31,500
    SOAS LL.M.31 Jul, 2025£25,740
    UCL LL.M.To be announced£34,400
    University of Oxford BCL29 Jan 2025£46,850
    University of Oxford MSc. in Law & Finance29 Jan 2025£53,340
    University of Cambridge LL.M. (University Composition Fee)Dec, 2024 (To be announced)£42,336
    University of Cambridge MCL (University Composition Fee)Jan 7, 2025£45,150

    Other regions (2024)

    School/UniversityCourseApplication DeadlineTuition
    Graduate Institute & University of GenevaMIDS Dec third week, 2024 (TBA)CHF 28,000
    Humboldt University of BerlinIDR LL.M. Apr 21, 2025€ 12,900
    Institute for Law & Finance, Goethe University Frankfurt am MainLL.M. FinanceRolling€ 20,000 
    Leiden Law SchoolLL.M.Apr 1, 2025€21,600
    National University of SingaporeLL.M. Oct 15, 2024S$37,100
    Sciences PoLL.M. in TADSFeb 23, 2025 €26,000
    Stockholm UniversityLL.M. in ICALJan 15, 202590,000 SEK
    World Trade InstituteTRAIL + LL.M.Dec 1, 2024 (Priority)CHF 18,000 

    We need your help in keeping this blog alive. If you feel that the content on this blog has helped you, please consider making a donation here

  • Photo by frank mckenna on Unsplash

    Five US law schools will be making a visit to India later this month, under the aegis of “Leading Law Schools”, offering the chance to meet their respective LLM graduate admissions teams. The two cities forming the India tour are Delhi (Oct 9) and Mumbai (Oct 10).

    For Delhi, you can register here.

    For Mumbai, you can register here.

    The schools visiting are:

    1. Columbia Law School
    2. Cornell Law School
    3. NYU Law
    4. Northwestern Pritzker School of Law
    5. Penn Carey Law, University of Pennsylvania

    We need your help in keeping this blog alive. If you feel that the content on this blog has helped you, please consider making a donation here

  • Photo by Brusk Dede on Unsplash

    Back in March last year, we ran a pilot of The Amicus Project (TAP) for graduate admissions at US law schools.  Broadly speaking, TAP was focused on two essential components of the LLM application process – deciding an applicant’s chances of admission, and the quantum of aid she would receive if admitted.

    For this pilot, we partnered with UNH Franklin Pierce School of Law, globally well regarded for their IP focus, and the Rajiv Gandhi School of Intellectual Property Law at IIT Kharagpur (RGSOIPL). Given the common focus areas of the two schools, there was a strong possibility that RGSOPIL graduates would be considering further studies in IP law.

    The day the pilot was launched, hopes were high, with plans and dreams involving scalability and improbable valuations.

    Six weeks later, it was clear that TAP had failed.

    The platform managed to generate only eleven leads, and not a single LLM application. Worse, these leads did not cross the query stage, much less reach the admissions stage.  

    On all metrics then, an utter failure.

    Yet.

    When seen in context, my terribly unbiased view was that TAP was a resounding success.

    In less than a week of filling out a form and uploading their CV’s, potential LLM applicants from RGSOIPL were informed of their chances of admission (low, medium and high) and the minimum financial aid they would receive if admitted. This was a conversation between the school and the applicant; no third parties were involved.

    The eleven leads came from a single Indian law school, all from individuals who met the criteria for admissions in the coming academic year; benchmarked to previous outreach activities, it would have taken seven-eight Indian law schools to generate a similar number of high-quality leads.

    The entire process, from start to finish, took less than eight weeks to set up and execute. There were no banner advertisements, no SEO optimization, no in-person visits nor LLM fairs – none of those expenses were incurred. All it took was an email to a faculty member who wanted to help her students.

    That is impressive.

    And now just imagine if TAP was implemented on a slightly larger scale. It would work with ten different international law schools, each specializing in a particular field of law and/or geographical location.  

    Indian LLM applicants (and eventually those from around the world), would now have access to a bouquet of LLM programs, each with complete transparency on admission chances and scholarships on offer. All this without spending a single rupee on application components like document assembly services, English proficiency tests, or even highly priced admission counsellors.

    Cliched as it sounds, TAP would become that elusive “win-win” in the world of student recruitments.

    Applicants would benefit from clarity and transparency. There would be publicly available data on quantum of aid offered (as opposed to the current opacity), as well as concrete information on the kind of profiles that make for successful LLM applicants in different schools. 

    Recruiting schools could see substantially lower recruitment costs, and a very public commitment to greater transparency in admissions. These schools would have the option to tailor the TAP platform as per their requirements – use it as a CRM tool for example. 

    Eventually, TAP could branch out into different streams of study instead of simply focusing on law. So, an applicant could reach out to a business school and a law school and get the same information from both through a single platform.

    For recruiting schools, TAP could become an admissions dashboard of sorts, allowing admission teams to quickly identify high quality candidates, and hand hold them through the different stages of the application process.

    Sooner rather than later, TAP would branch into an offline format as well, allowing for truly universal access.

    So, why hasn’t any of this happened yet?

    Well, for one, TAP will only work with a minimum time horizon of three years. Can international schools and their leadership work with such a long gestation period? Two, most schools require bespoke solutions – a one size fits all approach simply will not work. TAP will have to reconcile the individual nature of schools with the universal ethos that is at its core.  Three, the technology exists but across multiple categories like CRM, data analytics etc – TAP will have to be an amalgamation of this.

    These are just three reasons, there are twenty more than I can think of, and a hundred more that I cannot.

    But what I do know is that international higher education is in urgent need of a disruption. And it can all begin with a single tap.

    We need your help in keeping this blog alive. If you feel that the content on this blog has helped you, please consider making a donation here

  • Photo by Pars Sahin on Unsplash

    One of the wonderful things about growing old(er) is the chances you get to change perspectives; to witness them take different shape with time and lived experiences. To taste that bittersweet tinge of regret, wishing that you knew then what you know now. It is a tinge that has become familiar over the last few weeks, as my own foreign master’s program came to an end and the journey back “home” began.

    What should I have done differently, where should I have focused more of my time, how could I have better employed my time as a graduate student in a foreign land? And, perhaps most importantly, was I right in choosing which university to study at?

    It is this last question – choosing where to study that is the focus of this piece. With good reason – at Amicus Partners this is often the most perplexing questions our clients face.  

    There are a few tools that one can use. Rankings for instance. Like them or not (I don’t), rankings are one of the most accessible, and popular metrics. Then there is subject expertise – many law schools, for instance, have developed reputations for subject-specific LLM’s; this often goes a long way in helping speed up the decision-making process.  

    Of course, there is the total cost of attendance which includes cost of living – particularly relevant with the depreciating rupee and the increasing rates of tuition. Or you can rely on peer networks – what have the people you know indicated about a particular school or course. There is also great value in reaching out to alumni and current students; graduate schools are very often proactive in facilitating these conversations.

    These are all valid factors, playing significant roles in my own decision. Highly “ranked” schools come with their own halo effect, more so if they are known for a specific field of study. Low costs of attendance are always attractive, and peer networks provide critical first-hand information that can be difficult to find elsewhere (exceptions being blogs like the *cough* *cough* Amicus blog).

    But there is more. A lot more. Which is where the changed perspectives come into play. If I had to go back in time, and make the decision once again, here are four factors that I would have given far more importance than I did back when I was applying.

    One, the weather. Winter and snow might look lovely in the movies, but living through it can be quite the opposite. The lack of sun for months on end can hurt and demotivate in a way that is hard to anticipate for those from sunnier lands. And if you are blessed with a tolerance to cold that may be best described as bhadralok then well, be prepared for some rather dark days ahead. Even with boroline.

    Two, the location. And by this, I mean the city (or town) that the graduate school is located in. And this is not from a networking perspective but rather from the lived experience perspective. Before going to Philadelphia, a friend of mine commented that the city would remind me of another great city – Calcutta. I had scoffed back then. Now, I must admit he was right.

    Bustling, multicultural cities have their own charm, as do university towns with their massive campuses oftentimes located in the middle of great natural beauty.

    Three, class size. With some graduate programs (I am looking at you US law schools) admitting more than two hundred students at a time, class size is an important consideration in the application decision. Having said that, this is not as straightforward as one may presume – smaller class sizes are not always better. A larger class size might allow for greater diversity in cohort profiles, an important factor if you are looking to build a network. This also means a larger alumni base, again something which can be important in the long run.

    Four, desi demographics – this is a true reflection of just how personal education decisions can be. For me, studying in a foreign country was occasionally a terribly isolating experience.  The grammar, the accents, the food, the color of skin – the differences reinforced just how far from home I was. And at moments when the homesickness was acute, a simple glimpse of the familiar was most welcome. It could be a desi grocery store (with outrageously priced Parle G), or a salwar kameez-clad aunty with the LV bag, or Indian-accented food (google “Little Sicily in Philadelphia”) – all welcome familiarities.

    At least every now and then.

    We need your help in keeping this blog alive. If you feel that the content on this blog has helped you, please consider making a donation here