• First Person Accounts (FPA’s) are meant to provide a first-hand account of law graduates who have pursued, or are pursuing, a post-graduate course (an LLM or otherwise) from different universities across the world.

    Aastha Kapoor recently graduated with an LLM from the University of Cambridge.
    Aastha Kapoor

    Aastha Kapoor recently graduated with an LLM from the University of Cambridge. In this FPA, the Jindal Law School graduate discusses her reasons for choosing Cambridge, the LLM experience itself, UK’s post-study work visa, and a whole lot more. 

    Given that you applied right after undergrad, how early on did you decide to pursue an LLM abroad? And once decided, how did you go about selecting where to apply? 

    I made the decision to pursue an LLM abroad around my fourth year in law school. By then, my interest in academia and research had already taken root, so further study felt like a natural next step.

    When it came to choosing where to apply, I weighed options in both the UK and the US but ultimately felt drawn to the UK’s academic approach.

    The common law connection between the UK and India also made the UK’s legal education feel like a seamless continuation of what I’d studied in India, making it the perfect fit for my goals.

    Looking back, what was the most challenging aspect of the Cambridge LLM application? Anything that you wish you had known before you started the application process?

    In my experience, what sets the Cambridge application apart from the other universities is the expectation to be succinct. Unlike most universities, Cambridge doesn’t just ask for a single Statement of Purpose; instead, you respond to three specific questions, each designed to draw out your unique motivations and experiences.

    The biggest challenge for me was crafting responses that were sharp and focused, truly capturing my goals and background without straying off course. Cambridge isn’t looking for one-size-fits-all answers; they want to see your genuine journey and vision. In hindsight, I wish I’d realized that there’s no ‘perfect’ formula, no ideal SOP or ultimate referee for your letters of recommendation.

    Could you tell me a bit about what a typical day at Cambridge looked like? How much time was spent in the classroom, on extracurricular activities, and in the library? 

    Life at Cambridge was full of excitement, with each day being different, but one thing stayed the same, the endless miles of walking! Each week, I had around four classes, each about two hours, plus occasional workshops. My time in the library shifted depending on the demands of the course, but consistency was essential. Preparing for classes made all the difference during examinations.

    Cambridge emphasized a unique approach to learning. How much you chose to invest in each subject was truly up to you. The readings were rich and engaging, enough to keep you busy and spark curiosity. At the end, the exams also tested how well you know about the subject, rather than your ability to merely reproduce what had been taught.

    During my time at Cambridge, I worked with the Cambridge International Law Journal as well as the Cambridge Pro Bono Project, both of which were very enriching experiences. As for social events, I often attended formal dinners and events at other friends’ colleges. During the summer, after exams, we spent days out in the sun, making the most of what Cambridge has to offer as a town.

    What were some of the highlights of your time at Cambridge? Were there any particularly memorable surprises along the way? 

    Cambridge is a world of its own. At first, the stunning surroundings become part of your daily routine, but then there are moments when it hits you: you’re walking past buildings that have stood for centuries, surrounded by history that’s both breathtaking and humbling.

    On one occasion, a few of us decided to take a spontaneous weekend trip to a nearby suburb, not knowing what to expect. To our surprise, it turned out to be a refreshing getaway, a house with a piano in the living room and a backyard perfect for playing frisbee.

    One of the most unforgettable experiences was the May Ball, an extravagant evening filled with incredible food, breathtaking decorations all over the college. Each college also hosted its own unique events, like the time I attended an orchestral concert where the performers sat in boats along the River Cam, with the sun setting behind them.

    But, beyond these grand experiences, it was the simpler moments that truly stayed with me, sitting by the River Cam, or punting along the water with a guitar. These moments of peaceful reflection were what truly made Cambridge unforgettable.

    You are now on the two-year Post Study Work Visa – is there a separate application required for this? Does one apply through the university? How much time should one set aside for this? 

    The Post Study Work (PSW) Visa process is fairly straightforward. Officially, the visa takes about eight weeks to process, but in my case, it was approved in just 20 days. You apply online, and the application itself is simple, mostly consisting of basic questions.

    However, the condition on the application is that you cannot leave the United Kingdom during the time your application is under consideration.

    You can only apply for the PSW Visa once your university confirms to the UK Visas and Immigration office that you’ve successfully completed your degree requirements.

    So, it’s a good idea to stay in touch with your university’s administration to ensure all paperwork is finalized on their end as soon as possible. That way, you can be ready to submit your application without delay once you become eligible.

    Early days, but how do you think the Cambridge LLM has helped you in your personal and professional growth? 

    The Cambridge LLM has had a profound impact on both my personal and professional growth. The academic environment and the unique study system truly sharpened my ability to think and write critically, encouraging me to approach legal issues from a deeper, more analytical perspective.

    The rigor of the coursework pushed me to refine my research skills and develop the ability to engage with complex concepts, which has significantly enhanced my academic capabilities. I have undoubtedly evolved as a student of law, acquiring a stronger foundation for future legal challenges. 

    What made the experience even more enriching was the opportunity to learn from my peers. They are an incredibly diverse and talented group of individuals who brought unique perspectives to every discussion. The classroom conversations were consistently engaging and intellectually stimulating. The humility and warmth of my peers also played a key role in my growth, where encouragement and mutual respect made it easy to step out of my comfort zone.

    On a professional level, being part of the institution has expanded my worldview and given me invaluable exposure to international legal frameworks. The connections I’ve made and the skills I’ve acquired at Cambridge have provided me with greater confidence as I continue to pursue a career in law and policy.

    It has not only deepened my passion for the law but has also given me the tools to approach the complexities of global legal issues with a renewed sense of purpose and determination.

    And lastly, any advice for the Indian law graduate who is considering a master’s at the University of Cambridge? 

    Don’t let the process intimidate you. The application journey can feel overwhelming, and it’s easy to think Cambridge is only for the ‘ideal’ candidate with a flawless profile. But it’s not about fitting a mould or checking every box. It’s about bringing your unique story, your aspirations, and your experiences to the table.

    Give it a shot without holding back.

    One thing I’d say is to avoid comparing your journey to that of others. Each person’s path is different, and the most important factor is your own passion and commitment. The Cambridge LLM isn’t a distant dream. It’s a real possibility if you’re willing to believe in your own potential.

  • As most readers know by now, First Person Accounts (FPA’s) are meant to provide a first-hand account of Indian law graduates who have pursued, or are currently pursuing, a post-graduate course (be it an LLM or otherwise) from different schools across the world.

    The FPA (International) is meant to broaden this scope somewhat, getting non-Indian law graduates to discuss their LLM experiences in different law schools across the world. 

    Javiera Moraga Valverde, LLM from Cornell Law School
    Javiera Moraga Valverde

    Earlier this year, Javiera Moraga Valverde graduated with an LLM from Cornell Law School and is currently working as a Foreign Associate in the international tax team at Grant Herrmann Schwartz & Klinger. In this FPA, the Chilean lawyer shares her reasons for choosing to study in the US, the trials and tribulations of sitting for the NY Bar, and some advice for foreign trained lawyers looking to find employment in the US. 

    At what point in your career did you start looking at a US LLM? Was this something you wanted to pursue even while doing the LLB at Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile?

    I’ve always wanted to come back to the US ever since I spent a year in Chicago when I was 15. That dream stuck with me through law school in Chile, and I started thinking about doing an LL.M abroad. Unfortunately, the high cost of US postgraduate education made me question if this was even an option for me, and I explored alternatives in Europe and Asia.

    However, my interest in tax law and the potential career opportunities in the US ultimately led me to seriously consider a US LL.M. The desire to specialize in taxes and work in the US became stronger after working in Chile, which is what pushed me towards applying to US LL.M. programs.

    And once you had decided to pursue a US LLM, how did you go about shortlisting where to apply? Why narrow down on Cornell?

    Because US LL.M. programs are so expensive, I initially planned to pursue my LL.M in Europe. I even applied to Queen Mary University of London, the University of Bristol, and the University of Amsterdam. But in the back of my mind, I knew I still wanted to try to get into a US Law School, and I had a feeling that this would be possible if I could get enough funding.

    With that in mind, I went to the 2022 Education USA LL.M fair in Santiago, Chile, and got application fee waivers from several law schools including Northwestern, NYU, UPenn, and Cornell.

    Later that year, I applied to all the schools that offered application fee waivers, and I ended up receiving admissions and scholarships from many of them.

    What sealed the deal for Cornell, though, was that a member of their Graduate Legal Studies team flew all the way to Santiago to meet with me in person. That personal touch made a huge difference. The generous scholarship that they offered, which covered a big chunk of my tuition, and the chance to go to an Ivy League school were also major factors.

    Slightly off topic, but right after your law degree in Chile, you worked as pro-bono lawyer at a Legal Aid Council – how was that experience, and when did you decide to make the switch to tax laws?

    My interest in tax law started during my LL.B. I was a teaching assistant for tax law courses with Professor Eduardo Lagos Lorent, and that really sparked my interest in the more strategic and complex side of law.

    After graduating, I did a six-month pro bono placement at the Legal Aid Council —it is important to note that this pro-bono experience is mandatory for becoming a lawyer in Chile— While it was an obligatory requirement, the experience was invaluable for getting hands-on experience with clients, and it confirmed my desire to specialize in tax law.

    Working at TH Partners after graduating further solidified that focus.

    Coming back to the Cornell LLM – how was the entire LLM experience? What were some of the more rewarding aspects of the LLM? And some of the most challenging?

    My LL.M experience at Cornell was both incredibly rewarding and intensely challenging. The specialized tax courses were fantastic, and engaging with renowned faculty was inspiring.

    However, the most significant challenges stemmed from the intense academic workload and the difficulties of navigating the US job market as an international student.

    Uprooting my life and moving my family to the US was a huge undertaking, and I often questioned my decision to leave behind a comfortable life in Chile.

    To make matters worse, Cornell’s career services for LL.M students were severely lacking, offering little to no support. Then I got the devastating news that I was initially deemed ineligible for the New York Bar Exam due to my foreign law degree, and I had to petition the New York Court of Appeals to be able to sit for the NY Bar.

    This whole experience taught me resilience and was among the most challenging periods of my life, but it also proved incredibly rewarding. The support of my incredible friends and classmates —who became my family during that difficult time— and the exponential personal growth that I experienced during this challenging period have been truly invaluable and ultimately the most rewarding aspects of this entire journey.

    Congratulations on passing the NY Bar – how early did you begin preparing for this? Any advice for foreign-trained lawyers on how to go about the entire Bar prep process?

    I had a fairly short timeframe to prepare for the New York Bar Exam—just over two months—but I made it work! My advice to foreign-trained lawyers is to create a structured study plan, use quality bar prep resources though be aware that most commercial bar preps are expensive.

    Consider becoming a student representative early in the academic year to get a discount, connect with other foreign-trained lawyers who’ve passed the bar exam, and focus intently on understanding US legal principles and practicing with many questions.

    Efficient use of your time is key.

    You are currently working at a firm that specializes in international tax – could you tell me a bit about how you went about the employment search? What are the kinds of career services assistance that Cornell provides? Any advice for foreign trained lawyers who are also seeking to work in the US?

    Landing this job was all about networking —I started way before I even moved to the US!— I talked to tons of people who had done an LL.M. before, and they all said to be super proactive and to develop a comprehensive job search plan immediately.

    Following this guidance, I created a detailed spreadsheet of potential networking contacts, dividing them into two categories: 1) US law firms (listing names, positions, firm details, and contact information of lawyers working in my area of interest, all sourced through online research) and 2) pre-LLM contacts (individuals I already knew or had connections with, in Chile, who could offer insights or referrals).

    I then dedicated 1-2 hours daily to crafting personalized emails introducing myself and requesting informational interviews. Over three months, I connected with well over 100 people. These conversations were invaluable, focusing on exploring open positions and securing referrals within their respective firms.

    I simultaneously took advantage of every networking opportunity Cornell offered—attending mixers, seminars, and any other event that might help me connect with practicing attorneys.

    While Cornell did provide some resources, such as workshops and online job boards, their career services, unfortunately, fell short in terms of specific support for international students in their job placement. I am convinced that my success (and the success of my classmates who also secured a post-graduation job in the US) was directly attributable to extensive networking efforts, coupled with effectively highlighting our unique background and experience.

    For foreign-trained lawyers seeking US positions, I strongly recommend a highly proactive, strategic job search. Prioritize networking, emphasize your unique skillset and international perspective, and remember these simple but powerful tips: always carry professional business cards (I found the pre-printed Cornell cards difficult to read, so I designed my own), prepare all essential application materials (resume tailored for the US market, customized cover letters, list of references, official transcripts, and a strong writing sample) long before you need them, and frequently consult Georgetown Law’s excellent LL.M. career manual—it’s a tremendously helpful resource.

    Lastly, any advice for law graduates from around the world who are looking to pursue a US LLM?

    I know how challenging and overwhelming can be once to decide to pursue a US LL.M. Here’s what I’d advise to anyone who is thinking of following such a path:

    • Research programs carefully: Find ones that really fit your goals, considering financial, academic, and other factors —check out the professors, the courses they offer, and how well they support international students.
    • Get some work experience: Having solid work experience under your belt before you apply makes you a much stronger candidate.
    • Be ready for a challenge: LL.M. programs can be tough, especially because they are usually very condensed in time, so be prepared for a heavy workload and have a full plate for at least a year!
    • Network like crazy: Start building your professional network now, don’t wait until you start your LL.M. I always say that having friends is way more important than having money. Cultivate your relationships and nurture them. A call to one person could be the one that makes a difference!
  • As most readers know by now, First Person Accounts (FPA’s) are meant to provide a first-hand account of Indian law graduates who have pursued, or are currently pursuing, a post-graduate course (be it an LLM or otherwise) from different schools across the world.

    The FPA (International) is meant to broaden this scope somewhat, getting non-Indian law graduates to discuss their LLM experiences in different law schools across the world. 

    Eugene Cheigh is currently an SJD candidate at American University Washington College of Law, where her focus is on international environmental law.
    Eugene Cheigh

    Eugene Cheigh is currently an SJD candidate at American University Washington College of Law, where her focus is on international environmental law. Eugene pursued an LLM from Georgetown University Law Centre, her second master’s degree in law after one from Sookmyung Women’s University in South Korea. In this FPA, she discusses life as an SJD candidate, her decision to study in the US, and a whole lot more. 

    Slightly off topic but what got you interested in environmental law? Was this an interest which stemmed from childhood? 

    I was interested in this field of study because global environmental issues are those whose severity I can experience most directly.

    What prompted you to pursue a second master’s after your time at the Sookmyung Women’s University? What were some of the experiences that you were looking for while deciding to apply for the second LLM? And how did you narrow down on Georgetown University Law Centre? 

    My ultimate academic goal was pursuing a doctoral degree (SJD degree) in the US. To apply for the SJD program, I needed an LLM degree from a US school. I decided to choose Georgetown University Law Center because it is ranked in the top 5 of the US law schools for international law.

    I expected to learn high quality international law classes from renowned professors. In addition, the fact that there are many Korean LLM alumni, and that it is located in D.C. was attractive.

    At that point in time, was a doctoral degree already on the cards? Or was this something you decided to do during your time at Georgetown? 

    I had already decided to pursue a doctoral degree before I started studying at the GULC. I’d like to work as a researcher or professor in my home country, and these positions would prefer a doctoral degree from a foreign school.

    It has been a few years since the Georgetown LLM, but looking back, what were some of the most challenging aspects of the course? As a foreign trained lawyer, were there any cultural aspects that you took time to get used to? 

    The most challenging aspect was language. Although English is a required language in the Korean curriculum, it is not my first language and we don’t use it in daily life. Since I went to summer (language) camp in the US when I was young, I didn’t have much trouble with daily conversation in English, but I needed time to understand legal English.

    In addition, Korea is a civil law country, whereas the U.S. is a common law country. Thus, it was difficult for me to follow the vast amount of case law.

    I am always curious to know how one identifies a thesis supervisor and topic – how did you go about this process? How long did you spend on this, and what attracted you to American University Washington College of Law? 

    Compared to the LLM program, many law schools don’t have an SJD program. Due to the lack of information, I spent my time searching schools and application requirements for a couple of months. Most of the schools which have an SJD program do not allow applicants to contact a supervisor beforehand (I think the admission office would match a student with an advisor).

    Thankfully, I had already decided my thesis subject while writing my master’s dissertation in Korea, so based on my interest, I listed about 10 law schools. I had known that my advisor I matched with at the American University Washington College of Law is a famous professor in my field of study, so I happily accepted the admission offer.

    The WCL is also ranked in the top 5 of the US law schools for international law and located in D.C. These are attractive factors, too. I was more satisfied to find that the WCL’s SJD program is well organized and helps students focus on their research from the beginning of the program as directed by the program director. 

    What have been some of the substantial differences between life as a graduate student, and then a doctoral candidate? What does a typical week look like? 

    [It is a ] research-oriented life.

    I spend most days pondering and searching about what to write and whether there is any material that supports the answers to the questions in my dissertation.

    Quite a broad question, but any advice on how law students and graduates can build on their research and writing skills? 

    Take a research and writing class. I took it at the GULC, and it was really helpful. I also highly recommend visiting the writing center in the law school and asking questions often.

    Lastly, any advice you would have for foreign trained lawyers looking to pursue higher studies in the United States?

    Having a clear goal from the start helps ensure commitment and prevents giving up along the way.

  • Photo by Glen Carrie on Unsplash

    One of the courses in the graduate program I attended focused on the economics of a startup, where you had to build an economic model of your venture. The idea was to understand the fundamentals of revenue, or rather the cost of revenue. In simple terms, how much would you have to spend to make how much.

    Central to this question is the paying customer – how does on acquire a customer (and at what cost), what are the conversion rates through the “marketing funnel”, what is the customer journey, and perhaps the most relevant of them all – what is the customer’s “lifetime” value.

    These are important questions, central to forming a credible business model. If nothing else, these are questions that you need to ask.

    Having said that, and this is where the vexation begins, can these questions apply to education? More specifically, can you apply these questions when the “product” you are selling is education, and the “paying customer” is a student?

    For at least five years, I certainly thought so.

    After all, Amicus Partners was and is in the business of education, helping paying customers fulfil their educational aspirations. The cost of acquisition, finding the right marketing channel, evaluating the customer’s lifetime value – these are all fundamental parts of our business model.

    It is a business model which rests on viewing students (and education) as a product, to be sold and bartered.

    This can get a bit discomforting. Or rather, it can get discomforting once you have been through the process yourself – becoming the very source of revenue for another organization.

    Which, in my case, turned out to be a US university.

    At various points in the graduate degree experience, I felt that all my university really cared about was my tuition dollars. Nothing more, nothing less. Worse than a cog (which is still a component of the whole), here it was your capital which was the cog, you are nearly insignificant.

    This was reflected in the relationships you built with your professors, the ways in which the university and its components viewed you, the often-exhausting levels of “brand building” that took place, and the campus experience itself.

    Of course, part of this strained relationship stems from the perspective students bring into the learning environment as well. The relationship between the two is that of service provider and paying customer.

    It is a perspective that I certainly held. 

    For instance, I entered the graduate course expecting a quantifiable return on investment, be it in social capital or capital of the more important kind. The degree, or the actual learning experience itself, was secondary. I suspect that there I am not the only one to think so; a high proportion of clients at Amicus Partners share a similar view of the LLM degree. 

    Is this all inevitable? Will universities and students view the other as simply a means to make money? To see how much can be extracted from the other, without forming a deeper bond, one that is not based on monetary or selfish gains? Is that what education will boil down to?

    I would like to believe otherwise.

    After all, I continue to place faith in the inherent power of education, and of the good that can come with stepping outside one’s known environment. And I think many Indian law graduates can and should derive this benefit.

    So, what is the way out?

    That is a question I am unable to answer.

    But there are some clues I have picked up along the way. Or rather, clues others have been kind enough to share with me. For instance, one of the most thought-provoking conversations I had was with Jon Boeckenstedt, who amongst other things, wrote this piece on the stress faced by admission teams in US colleges. 

    It was an article that deeply resonated with me; conversations I had with graduate admissions teams in US law schools supported a lot of the arguments Jon had made. Over a Zoom call, Jon told me (and here I paraphrase) to be very clear as to why you want to work in the field of education. And that if money is your primary motivator, then perhaps you ought to reconsider.

    I am only now beginning to understand what he meant to say.  

  • Photo by Pepi Stojanovski on Unsplash

    A few weeks ago, we had published a compilation of the rates of tuition and application deadlines for some of the more popular LLM’s from around the world. This was something that we had also done way back in 2022, albeit spread across two different articles.

    Looking at the tables of 2022 and 2024, it is clear that the rates of tuition are increasing, at a speed which I suspect is far more than the higher than US graduate school tuition inflation reported by the Education Data Initiative.

    For instance, look at the 2-year increase in the rates of tuition for five of the more popular US law schools in the table below. Barring the University of Chicago, where rates of tuition increased less than 5% over two years, the other schools were averaging at roughly 10% over the two-year period.

     

    SchoolTuition in 2022 (USD)Tuition in 2024 (USD)% Increase
    Columbia Law School$73,584$81,88811.28%
    Cornell Law School $74,098$81,3069.72%
    Georgetown University Law Centre$71,996$82,26414%
    Harvard Law School $70,430$77,1009.47%
    Stanford Law School $64,350$74,47515.73%
    UC Berkeley Law $69,857$75,5508.14%
    University of Chicago $73,185$76,4794.50%

    Unfortunately, this is only part of the picture. For Indian applicants, the second cause of concern is the weakening rupee. Here is a table containing the increase in tuition as measured in Indian rupees.

    SchoolTuition in 2022 (INR)Tuition in 2024 (INR)% Increase
    Columbia Law School₹57,83,702₹68,35,41218%
    Cornell Law School ₹58,24,102₹67,86,83117%
    Georgetown University Law Centre₹56,58,88568,66,79821%
    Harvard Law School ₹55,35,79864,35,74516%
    Stanford Law School ₹50,57,91062,16,62923%
    UC Berkeley Law ₹54,90,76063,06,36215%
    University of Chicago ₹57,52,34163,83,90811%
    Taking 1 USD = INR 78.60 as per here. 
    Taking 1 USD = INR 83.4727 as per here

    Now compare the increase in USD and increase in INR, and you are looking at upwards of a 20% increase in just two years. For those planning to pursue a US LLM in the near future, these are numbers that deserve some attention.

    SchoolIncrease in USD Increase in INR
    Columbia Law School11.28%18%
    Cornell Law School9.72%17%
    Georgetown University Law Centre14%21%
    Harvard Law School 9.47%16%
    Stanford Law School15.73%23%
    UC Berkeley Law8.14%15%
    University of Chicago4.50%11%